EDITORIAL - Rather than perpetuating a story in search of a scandal, let's take a moment and discuss employee compensation and of course, look at the facts. I cannot speak to the intent behind the recent editorials in the Madera Tribune, but many people have expressed legitimate concerns regarding employee compensation which lend fair questions. The public absolutely deserves to know how their money is being spent. Employee compensation is public information that is a part of the policy process and requires review. Madera's employee compensation information, along with all other California cities, is published and made available to the public every year.
During the recession our city squeezed and stretched every dollar we could; we did more with less and still provided the best service delivery for Madera. The effects of the recession were devastating to a large number of residents and homeowners in Madera and City Hall was no different. The City strategically absorbed retirements and open positions and redistributed work amongst remaining employees. All departments cut their operating budgets and employees took cuts to their compensation. During this difficult economic time, while other public entities in California were filing for bankruptcy, I am proud to say that the City of Madera had no layoffs to any of its employees and fared much better than most cities around the State. During the recession, we grew our monetary reserves to insure continuity of the services our citizens expect.
EDITORIAL- Has hate become the response emotion toward everyone we disagree with or those who may be different than us? Unfortunately for many people, the answer is yes.
EDITORIAL - During the annual legislative conference in Washington D.C., Madera County Supervisor David Rogers let lawmakers and supervisors from across the nation know he means business when it comes to fighting for water storage.
EDITORIAL - The majority party recently enacted the largest budget in California state history. I truly hoped leadership would craft a fiscally prudent measure, prioritizing money for rural California. Unfortunately, that did not happen. Once again, the urban agenda wins, ignoring the critical issues affecting my rural district. Sacramento has increased spending significantly, and continues to bolster a government unable to address a number of crucial problems our state is facing. Furthermore, the majority party has used the budget process to force through several non-fiscal policies without the public’s ability to provide comment.
EDITORIAL - I am not a politician, I am a public servant. That is why I am writing this warning to those who think it’s acceptable to sit out an election.
GREENVILLE, S.C.
IRVINE, Calif. - 
